Insights

• A new law criminalizing the demanding or receipt of payments from U.S. individuals or entities gives the U.S. Department of Justice new tools to extend its targeting of non-U.S. individuals in corruption investigations.
• This puts politically connected individuals at risk of becoming subject to aggressive U.S. investigations, initiated by politically motivated domestic rivals.
• At-risk individuals should take proactive steps to protect their reputations, assets and liberty.

Read More

• The U.S. Department of Justice announced a new policy promising companies leniency if they report uncovered misconduct within six months of a merger or acquisition.
• Though this may at first appear to be “good news,” it demonstrates the DOJ’s increasing aggressiveness to companies – including non-U.S. companies – that did not commit any wrongdoing.
• We look at why companies should be wary of cooperation, and how they can approach the DOJ more prudently.

Read More

• The U.S. Department of Justice is continuing to extend its long arm jurisdiction into aggressively scrutinizing individuals in Latin America.
• Many targets may become embroiled in what can be overstated allegations, threatening their assets, liberty and reputation.
• Targets need to work with cross-border counsel knowledgeable in the DOJ’s tactics to push back as early as possible.

Read More

• Aggressive antitrust enforcement is a priority for the U.S., both at home and abroad.
• Korean companies are on the radar, particularly with alleged procurement fraud, putting them at risk of massive fines and multijurisdictional investigations.
• We explain the risks and responses Korean companies should consider.

Read More

• Israeli and other Middle Eastern and African nationals are increasingly at risk as U.S. and Western enforcement agencies aggressively pursue cross-border actions, in many cases based on incomplete facts.
• With cooperation from countries like Israel, those targeted can risk their assets, reputation and liberty if they are not adequately prepared.
• We explain what steps individuals can take to push back and get the facts straight.

Read More

• Recent comments by top U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officials seem to signal an emphasis on leniency programs for companies cooperating on corruption and bribery investigations.
• However, non-U.S. companies should not let their guard down – the DOJ continues to stretch the bounds of its jurisdiction to aggressively prosecute companies beyond the U.S.
• We unpack counteroffensive strategies at-risk companies should consider to stand up to DOJ overreach and drive successful outcomes.

Read More

• Korean and U.S. antitrust enforcers are working ever closer together in investigating potential anticompetitive behavior.
• Korean companies are at risk – even conduct based entirely in Korea could be scrutinized.
• We look at the enforcement hotspots and how Korean companies can deploy an effective multijurisdictional defensive strategy.

Read More

• The U.S. Department of Justice has released new guidelines that signal their aggressive prosecution of individuals and companies outside the U.S.
• At-risk non-U.S. companies must understand the potential implications of the DOJ’s new position.
• Our global Government Enforcement Defense team explains why internationally based former U.S. government lawyers are best positioned to address the issues.

Read More

• South Korea and U.S. antitrust regulators are increasing collaboration in cross-border matters, with the Biden administration gearing up enforcement.
• Potential targets include South Korean companies that conduct business with the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK).
• Our team explains why an aggressive, multi-jurisdictional defense is necessary to mitigate the risks

Read More

• The U.S. government has set its sights on market manipulation and “spoofing” among both traditional and digital currency traders.
• For the trading firms and other market participants who could be in the government’s crosshairs, now is the time to plan how you will respond to a subpoena.
• Traders and trading firms that find themselves on the receiving end of a subpoena related to spoofing or market manipulation should not immediately assume that cooperation is the best or only way to respond.

Read More

• The web of U.S. sanctions across the globe is dynamic and complex, and it can affect companies doing business in any corner of the world, even those with limited ties to the U.S.
• Inadvertent sanctions violations can be considered “egregious” by OFAC and subject violators to significant fines.
• Secondary sanctions are an often unwitting risk. 

Read More

• A new Multilateral Framework on Procedures in Competition Law Investigation and Enforcement (MFP) is being finalized.
• Although the new MFP will not be binding on all enforcement regimes, the MFP’s compliance mechanisms should incentivize agencies to comply with the common commitments.
• This announcement raises five key questions about the future of global antitrust enforcement.

Read More

• The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are aggressively directing their enforcement resources to combat against digital currency traders in the UK and greater EMEA.
• Counsel located in the UK and greater EMEA region needs to be aware of the risks involved with this new-found aggression and how to prepare for any U.S.-driven regulatory inquiries or subpoenas.
• Firms representing European entities and individuals involved in cryptocurrency should be more comprehensive in their preparation. 

Read More