In light of the sanctions imposed on Minister Alexandre de Moraes, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) recently issued a decision reaffirming that foreign laws and acts do not have automatic effect in Brazil—essentially establishing what is known in international law as a “blocking statute.”
For companies with operations in both Brazil and the U.S., this creates a clear dilemma: complying with U.S. sanctions may violate Brazilian rules; ignoring them may result in penalties in the U.S.
To mitigate these risks, it is essential to assess potential exposures, coordinate international strategies, and proactively manage reputational and legal risks.
The new U.S. administration will likely continue to embrace economic sanctions as a tool for pressuring political adversaries abroad.
Recent moves include pressure on historically aligned nations such as Canada, Mexico, and Colombia and sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Should relations between the U.S. and other governments or organizations shift from the status quo, at-risk entities and individuals may take proactive steps to mitigate potential risks.
The UK continues to use sanctions as an aggressive political strategy to attack adversarial governments and their perceived allies.
While Russian entities have borne the focus of these efforts in recent years, the potential use of secondary sanctions—targeting those with connections to sanctioned countries or individuals—could be on the horizon.
This development may significantly impact Chinese businesses and citizens engaged in trade or holding interests in the UK.
Sanctions against Russia have increasingly targeted the global shipping and maritime industry as the U.S., UK, EU, and other allied governments seek to enforce its crude oil price cap more aggressively.
With Russian crude exports on the rise, individuals and businesses with ties to the global shipping and maritime industry – particularly Greek and Cyprus-based companies – could find themselves exposed to the widening sphere of Western sanctions.
We explain how individuals and businesses with ties to the Cypriot shipping industry and their advisors may be able to mitigate potential risks.
The United States and its allies continue to use sanctions to attack adversarial governments and their perceived allies, putting companies and individuals with tenuous or merely alleged ties at risk.
Recent sanctions have targeted Russia, but PRC companies were designated in the February 2024 round, signaling increasing risk to PRC individuals and business if China-U.S. relations deteriorate.
At-risk individuals and business should take proactive steps to prepare.
As governments increasingly use sanctions as a geopolitical tool, ultra-high-net-worth individuals – including those with connections to Cyprus – are at risk.
Cypriot officials and financial institutions have already taken steps to target certain individuals, even those who are not sanctioned.
We explain pre-emptive steps at-risk individuals and their advisors can take to mitigate the risks and protect themselves.
The U.S., UK and their allies are continuing to find tools to exert pressure on China.
Businesspeople in Greater China with global interests could become targets of financial sanctions if diplomatic relations between China and the U.S. deteriorate further.
We explain how financial and wealth advisors can mitigate the risks these clients face if they act early and decisively.
As geopolitical tensions heighten, Chinese ultra-high-net-worth individuals may become increasingly at risk of becoming the target of forfeiture by hostile foreign governments.
Governments around the world have shown increasing willingness to go after assets owned by those in disfavored jurisdictions.
By deploying a coordinated global strategy, Chinese UHNWIs can lawfully defend their legitimately earned wealth.
Prices of Russian and other sovereign debt are falling as their economies buckle, presenting both opportunities and challenges for investors.
Enforcing the debt against sovereign entities is already difficult, more so when sanctions are involved.
As our Claim Monetization & Dilution team explains, non-traditional strategies may go further in putting maximum pressure on sovereigns and maximizing returns.
Relations between India and the U.S. have recently experienced a few blows, including the termination of the former's preferential trading status with the U.S.
For future Indian defendants, it will be of paramount importance to understand the strategies and tactics of U.S. enforcement agencies in charge of bribery, national security and fraud investigations.
When regulators come knocking, those who choose to sit idly by will find themselves at a disadvantage.
The web of U.S. sanctions across the globe is dynamic and complex, and it can affect companies doing business in any corner of the world, even those with limited ties to the U.S.
Inadvertent sanctions violations can be considered “egregious” by OFAC and subject violators to significant fines.
