We offer an aggressive, trial-focused approach to solve problems.
Below are some recent victories we have achieved for our clients.
Kobre & Kim won the dismissal of a putative U.S. federal securities class-action complaint against Rebekah Brooks, the former head of News International, arising out of the News of the World and The Sun’s news gathering practices, including the much publicized phone-hacking allegations. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over Ms. Brooks and another defendant (NI Group) and that the plaintiffs otherwise failed to state a claim against all defendants, which included News Corp., its subsidiary, NI Group and other individual defendants.
Kobre & Kim obtained a decision on behalf of BlackRock, JPMorgan and Golden Gate Capital that Incora/Wesco’s 2022 uptier transaction breached the lien protections in the Company’s 2026 secured note indenture. Kobre & Kim was brought in as lead trial counsel and brought the case to Bankruptcy Court in Houston, where the firm’s advocacy altered the negotiations over hundreds of billions of dollars of liability management transactions.
Kobre & Kim negotiated a large settlement for investors in a project related to fake mobile solar generators in a multi-billion dollar fraud aided and abetted by a construction equipment rental company.
Kobre & Kim’s London insolvency practice obtained a groundbreaking security for costs award for its clients in a cross-border insolvency matter. Kobre & Kim represents clients in a challenge to the UK recognition of a Russian insolvency on the grounds that recognition is manifestly contrary to UK public policy. In a first-of-its-kind award, the foreign liquidator was ordered to post substantial security for our clients’ costs – significantly changing the dynamics of the litigation in clients’ favor.
Kobre & Kim secured a ruling upholding a US $48.5 million Arbital Award for Elliott Associates, L.P. against the Republic of Korea (ROK). The High Court of England and Wales dismissed the ROK’s application to set aside the award in favor of Elliott.
Kobre & Kim won a landmark victory for creditors in the United Arab Emirates after the Dubai Court of Cassation issued a final decision unwinding the transfer of shares by the debtors to a family member, even though the transfer took place before the issuance of a final judgment confirming the debt owed to the creditors.
Kobre & Kim’s Hong Kong team achieved a major victory in an international arbitration for a leading international flooring manufacturer headquartered in the U.S. against several Chinese counterparties. The arbitration was seated in Hong Kong and administered by the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules and related to disputes arising out of multiple contracts involving a range of applicable laws, including Hong Kong law and PRC law. In a final award, the arbitral tribunal awarded our client 100% of its claim for damages plus interest, legal fees, and costs and expenses.
Kobre & Kim's Hong Kong team secured favorable results for a Cayman partnership holding the controlling stake in a Chinese company in a dispute with an early-stage investor. Resolution of the dispute enabled the client to restructure the investment, avoid Hong Kong arbitration, and settle Cayman Islands litigation.
Kobre & Kim's Hong Kong team negotiated the resolution of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) insider trading charges, a preliminary injunction and an asset freeze on behalf of a Chinese national.
Kobre & Kim's Hong Kong team secured favorable results for a Korean company in a Singapore International Arbitration Centre arbitration claim against a U.S. company in a substantial joint venture dispute.
Kobre & Kim's Hong Kong team achieved favorable results for a Chinese investment company in front of the SEC in connection with document requests that raised issues under China state secrets law.
Kobre & Kim’s Hong Kong team successfully assisted in efforts to reverse a Nasdaq decision to delist a Chinese company.
Kobre & Kim's Hong Kong team persuaded the DOJ and SEC to treat a regional sales manager at the Chinese subsidiary of a U.S. financial services company as a witness, rather than a subject, in a joint investigation into possible Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations arising out of travel and entertainment perks allegedly provided to employees of Chinese state-owned banks.
Kobre & Kim’s Hong Kong team won a summary judgment application before the High Court of Hong Kong on behalf of a private investment fund. The judgment, in the sum of ~US $30 million, was obtained against the founders and controlling shareholders of a prominent PRC company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Kobre & Kim represented Chevron in the successful enforcement of an investment treaty arbitration award against the Republic of Ecuador for US $100 million+ (with interest). The firm's efforts in executing an enforcement strategy, including asset tracing, identifying seizure targets and the service of numerous discovery requests, culminated in Ecuador’s paying Chevron the entirety of the original award plus interest.
Kobre & Kim represented an investor facing judgments totaling over US $80 million resulting from three arbitration awards, which stemmed from disputes related to the acquisition of a Thai energy company. Kobre & Kim achieved a significant victory when the BVI Commercial Court granted a rarely awarded ruling, setting aside certain aspects of an enforcement order it had earlier made on public policy grounds.
In a precedent-setting case before the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal, Kobre & Kim’s Cayman Islands team successfully argued that William and Patricia Millard’s U.S. tax liabilities cannot be considered a liability for the purposes of Cayman Islands bankruptcy proceedings, as such liabilities are not provable under Cayman Islands law. The court’s ruling prevents judgment debtors from attempting to shield themselves against the international enforcement of U.S. tax liabilities by initiating personal bankruptcy proceedings in the Cayman Islands.
Kobre & Kim successfully defended the directors of Spectrum Galaxy Fund Limited (Spectrum), a BVI hedge fund, in an application for court permission in the BVI to commence derivative proceedings in Florida on behalf of the company. Kobre & Kim’s strategy, which included filing additional evidence that was admitted despite vigorous opposition, was specifically referenced in the court’s decision.
Kobre & Kim’s Offshore team achieved favorable results for an offshore hedge fund executive in a regulatory investigation concerning alleged misapplication of funds and persuaded the regulator that no action needed to be taken against our client.
Kobre & Kim LLP represented a Fortune 500 oil and gas company on strategies for the global monetization of a US $171 million arbitral award handed down by the LCIA against a BVI company and a Bahamian company. Kobre & Kim obtained the winding up of the BVI parent company following contested applications in the BVI Commercial Court to set aside a statutory demand and appoint liquidators over the company. The decision was ultimately upheld by the Court of Appeal after further contested hearings.
Kobre & Kim’s Offshore team persuades the court to exercise jurisdiction over overseas defendants in the courts of the Turks & Caicos Islands, in proceedings arising out of a failed real estate development in the Caribbean.
Kobre & Kim’s New York and London teams obtained an order in the Cayman courts to wind up holding companies in joint venture created by U.S.-based hedge funds to control a large part of the power generation sector in South America and persuaded a U.S. federal court to dismiss applications under 28 USC 1782 to depose witnesses in support of the Cayman proceedings.
Kobre & Kim represented a group of lenders who provided financing to an arms dealer operating through a BVI company. The firm initiated proceedings in BVI Commercial Court to obtain a third party freezing order over the shares in, and assets of, the BVI company. The BVI Commercial Court granted a Chabra injunction following a contested hearing.
Kobre & Kim’s London team secured an application to the Cayman courts for injunctive relief against intransigent Hong Kong-based company directors, causing the directors to capitulate and provide the relief sought.
Representation of China-based judgment creditors in the international enforcement of an HKIAC arbitration award against a Chinese debtor with operations and assets in Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands, United States, United Kingdom and mainland China.
Representation of a judgment creditor in Korea in the enforcement of a default judgment entered of approximately US $5 million affirmed by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea, against a judgment debtor with operations and assets in Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands, Canada and several other locations.
Representation of a Chinese maritime vessels and equipment manufacturer in proceedings in the British Virgin Islands involving millions of dollars in dispute against several debtors arising from oil rig construction contracts.
Representing a defendant BVI company in successful opposition by minority shareholders to an application in the BVI Commercial Court in a large investment fund for permission to commence derivative proceedings in the name of the BVI company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against directors accused of breach of fiduciary duties, fraud and the making of secret profits. The allegations involved disputed expert evidence on minority shareholder oppression, conflicts of law, disputes issues of forum and detailed accounting evidence.
Representation of liquidators appointed by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) for two related Australian agricultural companies subject to liquidation as a result of high-value tax liabilities in filing a Norwich Pharmacal application to pursue discovery against several offshore entities believed to hold assets of the companies in liquidation.
Devising and implementing a global enforcement strategy to recover an arbitral award by the Beijing Arbitration Commission against Chinese billionaire Jia Yueting. Kobre & Kim was the first to successfully obtain injunctions against the debtor and his nominees in the BVI and California, where he resides; to obtain an order for his in-court examination, which caused him to file an urgent Chapter 11 petition; to move to dismiss his Chapter 11 filing in Delaware Bankruptcy Court; and to successfully move to transfer the proceedings back to California federal court, which is more familiar with his history and conduct.
Representation of the Joint Provisional Liquidators of the apex holding company of a defunct digital currency exchange in (i) obtaining control of group companies in the Seychelles, Malta, Hong Kong, Singapore, and elsewhere, (ii) pursuing the recovery of approximately US $30m in misappropriated digital assets in Dubai, the UK, the PRC and Hong Kong; and (iii) pursuing claims and injunctive relief against a former director in Hong Kong, and potentially in other jurisdictions.
Kobre & Kim represented the Liquidator of FCI Markets, Inc., Paul Pretlove, in seeking restitution for victims of a forex Ponzi scheme originating from the UAE. Kobre & Kim initiated liquidation proceedings, obtaining provisional and full liquidation orders in 2017-2018, supported by victim affidavits. Recognition was secured in Australia, the U.S. and Dubai.
Kobre & Kim acted for Skatteforvaltningen (“SKAT"), the Ministry of Customs and Taxation for the Kingdom of Denmark, in obtaining multiple orders for discovery against over 20 BVI and Cayman Islands registered agents and corporate service providers. SKAT has pursued claims against over 300 defendants in multi-district litigation in the SDNY and proceedings in Dubai (DIFC), Malaysia, Canada and most notably in London. SKAT claimed it was the victim of the widely reported “Cum¬Ex" fraud masterminded by Dubai-financier Sanjay Shah, through which SKAT was deceived into paying out US $2 billion in bogus dividend withholding tax refunds.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.